1990s:DAY C.N.N,OTHERS "KILLED"GENOCIDE NEWS

1990s:DAY C.N.N,OTHERS "KILLED"GENOCIDE NEWS

BY ABDULMUMINI ADEKU 

AMERICAN SOLDIERS CLOSE IN ON AN AFGHAN VILLAGE RECENTLY

News just hitting the News office Desk of Paedia Express Multimedia Group in Lagos,Nigeria suggests that case of a  massive cover -up took place in an unreported case of genocide due to a chemical attack by the United states Armed Forces as they battled insurgents in a village near Kabul in Afghanistan  many years ago .

In a chat with this reporter an impeccable source had revealed how a friend of his working with a Chinese News Agency outfit and a seasoned war reporter had told him privately while discussing the rot in the global media sector that he and his colleagues were forced to keep sealed lips over a gas attack in a village near Kabul sometimes in the early 1990s.

He had insisted when his friend asked for permission from one of his superiors on the matter he was asked to keep quiet due to orders from above.

The Source speaks:"it was a very long time ago,The CNN and all the other media firms globally reporting the incidents from Afghanistan were all forced to keep quiet "

"They were paid by NATO officials ,whom i believe were acting at the behest of the United states of America,i think it was a chemical attack due to a miscalculation from the U.S .Forces on an Afghanistan village near Kabul and the entire mainstream global media blacked out on this "

The source lamented that the press needs to buckle up on its true roles as a gatekeeper otherwise the world will buckle under the weight of repression.

It had emerged that the United states of America were thinking seriously of reducing their men on the fighting fields of Afghanistan till a Paedia Express report suggested that the Taliban will over run President Ashraf Ghani's regime ..

On December 9, 1948, the United Nations took corrective action to identify a crime that not long before had been nameless and lacking explicit recognition in international criminal codes. With its approval of the 1948 Convention on Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, the United Nations not only defined the concept to include a variety of acts “committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group, as such” but also officially criminalized genocide in international law. Genocide, however, remains a contested concept; debates about its meaning and application may even hamper efforts to intervene against the harm that perpetrators inflict. Including exploration about the best ways to deal with genocidal killers, this chapter assesses the extent to which the effects of genocide include sound responses and resistance to the failures of ethics.