Wednesday 30 January 2019

PAEDIA EXPRESS,BOUY SPORTS LAUNCH GLOBAL HUNT FOR SALA

Emiliano Sala.jpg
DEAR SIR,
SEARCH FOR EMILIANO SALA:MATTERS ARISING
WE WOKE UP TO THE SAD TALES OF THE SUDDEN DISAPPEARANCE OF THE SOCCER STAR,THE ARGENTINE EMILIANO SALA AFTER WINNING A CONTRACT TO FEATURE FOR THE CARDIFF CITY FOOTBALL CLUB OF ENGLAND FROM A.S. NANTES FOOTBALL CLUB OF FRANCE.
FOR A PLAYER TO FEATURE FOR CARDIFF CITY OR WIN A CONTRACT WITH IT  IN THE HUGELY PRESTIGIOUS BUT TOUGH AND ENTERTAINING ENGLISH PREMIER LEAGUE SPEAKS VOLUME OF SALA'S TALENT.
SINCE THE NEWS SAY THAT HE IS MISING AND HAD NOT BEEN DECLARED DEAD THEN THERE IS A FAINT POSSIBILITY THAT WE CAN OFFER SOME HELP.
BY THE SPECIAL GRACE OF GOD AND NOT BY OUR OWN POWERS WE HAVE HAD MANY YEARS OF PROVEN SUCCESS IN FORENSIC JOURNALISM.
WE WERE WORKING ON THE HYPOTHESIS THAT HE PROBABLY COULD BE ON AN ISLAND TRAPPED IN THE ENGLISH CHANNEL BUT SINCE THE NEWS NOW SAY THAT HIS PLANE WAS FOUND ON A BEACH IN THE LAST ONE HOUR,HUNCHES ARE HE COULD BE FOUND ON THE SAME ISLAND WHERE THE WRECKAGE OF THE PLANE WAS FOUND.
EMILIANO SALA AND HIS PILOT PROBABLY WONDERED AROUND ON SIGHT SEEING ON THE ISLAND AFTER MANY DAYS OF EXPECTING TO BE RESCUED.
THE MANAGEMENT AND BOARD OF EITHER CARDIFF CITY AND A.S. NANTES FOOTBALL CLUB OF FRANCE CAN GET IN TOUCH WITH US IF THEY WISH .
THANKS,
YOURS FAITHFULLY,
ABDULMUMINI ADEKU.
OFFICIAL ADDRESS:
ABDULMUMINI IREYI ADEKU,
FOUNDER,
E.N.M.PAEDIA EXPRESS MULTIMEDIA GROUP OF LAGOS,NIGERIA
MAUSIGHT SUITE,FIRST FLOOR,
TWO THOMAS SALAKO STREET OGBA,LAGOS,NIGERIA
EMAIL:enmpaediaexpress@gmail.com
+2348105720262
Emiliano Sala.jpgEmiliano Sala.jpgEmiliano Sala.jpg

EMILIANO SALA'S PLANE FOUND ON FRENCH BEACH



Emiliano Sala's plane wreckage found as two cushions discovered on French beach after 10 days - The 28-year-old was on his way to join his new Premier League teammates when his plane disappeared on Monday, January 21 - Sala recenly completed a £15m deal to the EPl side from Nantes Some parts of the missing plane (two cushions) transporting Cardiff City record signing Emiliano Sala have reportedly been found on a French beach. The 28-year-old Argentine striker was on his way to join his new teammates in Wales when his aircraft vanished last Monday. SunSport reports that the Air Accident Investigation Branch (AAIB) revealed that cushions are likely to have been from the Piper Malibu plane which vanished last Monday were found. 
NEWS CREDIT:SUN NEWSPAPERS OF LONDON,ENGLAND

TRIBUTES RAIN IN AT CARDIFF CITY OVER EMILIANO SALA'S DISAPPEARANCE

ZAMFARA:MUTAWALLE WAVES THE MAMMOTH CROWD IN GUSAU AS HE CAMPAIGNS

PHOTO CREDIT:SHOLA SOLKEM OLUGBEMIROImage may contain: one or more people, people standing, crowd and outdoor

ZAMFARA:THE PEOPLE AWAITS MAN WITH A DATE ON DESTINY,MUTAWALLE

Image may contain: one or more people, crowd and outdoor

ZAMFARA:MUTAWALLE AND HIS MEN WOO VOTERS FOR 2019 POLLS

Image may contain: one or more people, people standing, crowd and outdoor

ZAMFARA:DR BELLO MUTAWALLE ON THE BEAT AS HE CAMPAIGNS VIGOROUSLY FOR THE PEOPLE'S MANDATE

Image may contain: 1 person, outdoor

ZAMFARA:MUTAWALLE IS A CROWD PULLER

Image may contain: one or more people and crowd

ZAMFARA CAMPAIGNS OF DR BELLO MUHAMMED MUTAWALLE

Image may contain: one or more people, people standing, crowd and outdoor

Nigeria Loses N197bn To Financial Services Fraud Annually —VP

By Lukman Amusa
The Vice President, Prof. Yemi Osinbajo  says Nigeria loses about N197 billion as cost of financial services fraud annually. The Vice President made the observation   at the stakeholders forum on financial fraud using telecoms platform organised by the Nigerian Communications Commission, NCC in collaboration with the Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN. Osinbajo, who was represented at the event by Barr. Bolaji Owoseye said the positive developments in the nation’s telecom sector attract new dangers  because fraudsters have also infiltrated the system to compromise telecom platforms, thus putting all these positive outlooks from mobile money and financial services at risk, leading to loss of huge amount of money to fraudsters every day.  Osinbajo  He noted that fake mobile money have proliferated with cloning of banks with fraudsters  to extract customers personal and financial information and other mischievous activities, insisting that we must continue to innovate to checkmate the cyber criminals. ‘‘The cost of financial services fraud to the country is a whooping 197bn annually.  Fake mobile money have proliferated with cloning of banks with fraudsters  to extract customers personal and financial information and other mischievous activities. ‘‘We can’t out of risk of fraudsters stop innovation.  We must continue to innovate. There are elderly people who do not have ATM cards.  They cannot associate with the risks associated with ATM cards. We must build confidence in the market to be able to bring in people who want to be within the platform. ‘‘One of the issues to resolve is who should have responsibility when fraud is committed. Sometimes you have four players: customers, bank, telecom, mobile service provider and nobody wants to take responsibility.  Historical, innovations have always brought progress and development to mankind but in the wake has always come the dark side. ‘‘The anticipation and unanticipated consequences of any invention is always available for evil minded to exploit to the detriment of the society. Nigeria has like otherwise has inevitable embrace the digital world through the use of telecommunications. ‘‘However, the tread off for greater efficiency and versatility in this new world is the increased negative application of innovation for criminal disposition. Without telecommunication, the originator of fake news has no capacity to spread falsehood so rapidly to such a wide spread audience without being quickly nipped in the bud. ‘‘ But in today’s world, fake news excuses the world to great danger. Each sector of the economy and society is exposed in different way to mouse of technology or any innovation.’’ On why we must retail mobile payment platforms, Osinbajo said, ‘‘They provide opportunity for personal and business anywhere. They remain an economical means of achieving financial conclusion. They are critical to bring ginger within the social safety net the most vulnerable members of the society. ‘‘All the vendors in the Home Grown School feeding programs are encouraged to register through digital platforms.  The Conditional Cash Transfer, though it is done in the rural areas, is done in cash but once a social register is done, effort is being made for all beneficiaries to get their stipends via mobile platform. ‘‘We must never out of fear refuse to innovate and be ahead of the fraudsters in the market. Right now there is no law that regulates Digital Currency in Nigeria.  Nigeria has no law but there are people that use crypto currency.  They are not waiting for law. But  yet, there will be problems and those problems have to be solved. We cannot refuse to create platforms to check fraudsters.’’ Continuing, the Vice President said, ‘‘The issue of today, the vulnerability of the financial sector to negative use of the technology is timely because no one can dispute the relevance of telecom to improve financial services. Indeed, the use of telecom services have helped to reduce banks’ operating cost and customers’ satisfaction.  Banks have obviously expanded their operational bases using these platform. ‘‘This proliferation of alternative banking channels through which banking transactions have performed. In this regard, the Nigerian banking industry has simply aligned itself with the global trend. However, it is this financial service delivery and opportunity for inclusion that is now threatened by fraud. Today, we are grabbing with new methods of fraud, such as Some card swaps, customer identity theft,  bank or customer base hark, BVN snatching and compromise of customer systems etc. Earlier in his  welcome address, the Executive Vice Chairman of NCC, Prof. Umar Danbatta said NCC has been collaborating with other agencies of government to not only achieve financial inclusion in the country but checkmate financial fraud courtesy of  its 8-Point Agenda. According to Danbatta, the idea is to be able to do those things that commission is mandated to do by government courtesy of the Act establishing the NCC. ‘‘We  realised early enough that it will be impossible to  accomplish the 25 functions assigned to NCC without close collaboration with other agencies of government and the federal government has given a directive to the effect that the agencies must collaborate to be able to achieve their mandates. ‘‘ We are collaborating very well in the area of mobile money and financial inclusion to the extent that the CBN is poised at giving license to telecomm operators to provide some kind of special service vehicle to operate in the financial sector with a view to driving mobile money penetration,  which stands at about only 1%, which is too low, compared to penetrations  in countries like Kenya 60%, Ghana 50%. ‘‘The reason for these high penetration these African countries is because mobile money service in those country are telecom driven, while in Nigeria it is bank driven. The CBN  has allowed the telecoms companies in Nigeria to go in and augment the  efforts being made by banks in order to drive mobile money service as well as ensure more inclusion. The target is that 80% of Nigerian should be included in the mobile money service, leaving only 20% which we hope in due course will be included.’’ ‘‘Another important area of collaboration now is  how  to check fraud in financial industry.  fraud that are being perpetrated by leveraging telecom infrastructure and the NCC is mandated to drive the deployment.  This is happening at a time when the level of financial fraud has reached N12.5billion. so something  needs to be done urgently to secure the confidence of Nigerians in the financial system as well as the telecom  system within the country. ‘‘Subscriber loose 12.5bn to service providers. If the deductions are illegal, they know what to do to bring it to a stop. There is s a complaint number, 622, they can loge their complaint through this number to see redress.  They can also lodge their numbers, nature of their complaints and we have seen instances where  complaints were resolved quickly. ‘‘ We insist that  where unfair deductions were made,   such deductions should be returned to the subscribers. NCC will not rest on its oars until all illegal deductions are paid back to the subscribers as well as ensuring that subscribers have confidence that when they are illegally deducted ,  they will be rest assured that these deductions will logically pursued until they are returned to them.’’ For the NCC boss, another area of collaboration is when the Commission intervened jointly  with CBN to stave off the take over of 9Mobile. This he said has been done successfully as they succeeded in protecting  three to four thousand Nigerian jobs in pay roll of 9Mbile and also ensuring services to close to 18 million Nigerian are not disrupted. ‘‘We have succeeded  in ensuring stability not only in the telecom sector  but as well as in the financial sector. And we have succeeded to improving the image of this country to the investors who may which to come in to invest.’’ On his part, Deputy Director, Payment Systems at CBN, Musa Jimoh, said  this particular stakeholders forum has afforded the CBN the opportunity to present some of the achievement  it made within the payment system in direct partnership with NCC to resolve some of the digital communication issues we have. ‘‘NCC has actually tried in terms of providing  effective platforms for financial services to thrive in Nigeria but there are still areas that we need to strengthened, which is why the stakeholders have come here to discus. ‘‘ One of the issues to be discussed is Sim Swap and how we can tame the incidences that are being committed as a result of Sim Card Swap. All tricks and methods had been applied but the fraudsters are still beating us down.  We will be able to come up  with resolution that will help us tame the fraud.’’

Monday 28 January 2019

25 Lawyers Drag PMB To Court, Move To Quash Onnoghen’s Suspension

By our correspondent
Twenty Five constitutional lawyers, today dragged President Muhammadu Buhari before the Federal High Court in Abuja to challenge what they termed as illegal suspension of the Chief Justice of Nigeria, CJN, Justice Walter Onnoghen. President Buhari The suit came on a day the Code of Conduct Tribunal, CCT, sitting in Abuja, okayed indefinite adjournment of proceedings in the non assets declaration charge the Federal Government filed against the suspended CJN. The Plaintiffs, led by human rights activist, Mr. Johnmary Jideobi, posed two legal issues for the determination of the court. They prayed the high court to determine, “Whether by the combined interpretation of Section 153(1) (i) paragraph 21(a) of the 3rd Schedule and Sections 271, 291, 292 and 231 of the amended 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria [and especially in view of the Supreme Court decision in Elelu-Habeeb vs. AGF (2012) 13 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 1318);], there exists any authority in the 1st Defendant (Buhari) to suspend the 4th Defendant (Onnoghen) as the Chief Justice of Nigeria? As well as, “Whether by the combined interpretation of Section 153(1) (i) paragraph 21(a) of the 3rd Schedule and Sections 271, 291, 292 and 231 of the amended 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria [and especially in view of the Supreme Court decision in Elelu-Habeeb vs. AGF (2012) 13 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 1318);] the purported suspension of the 4th Defendant as the Chief Justice of Nigeria by the 1st Defendant on the 25th January, 2019 is not unconstitutional?”. Upon determination of the questions, the Plaintiffs, asked the court to hold that President Buhari lacked the constitutional power to suspend Onnoghen as the CJN. “A Declaration of this Honourable Court that by the combined interpretation of Section 153(1) (i) paragraph 21(a) of the 3rd Schedule and Sections 271, 291, 292 and 231 of the amended 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria [and especially in view of the Supreme Court decision in Elelu-Habeeb vs. AGF (2012) 13 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 1318);] the purported suspension of the 4th Defendant as the Chief Justice of Nigeria by the 1st Defendant on the 25th January, 2019 is of no legal force, unconstitutional and a nullity. “An orders of this honourable court quashing and setting aside [as being unconstitutional and of no legal force] the purported suspension of the 4th Defendant by the 1st Defendant. “An order of this honourable court restoring the 4th Defendant forthwith to his office as the Chief Justice of Nigeria. Likewise, “An order of perpetual injunction of this honorable court restraining the 1st Defendant or any other person acting on his behalf or at his direction from further suspending the 4th Defendant from his office as the Chief Justice of Nigeria”. READ ALSO: The CJN in the political arena Aside President Buhari, other Defendants in the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/113/2019, were the National Judicial Council, NJC, the Acting CJN, Justice Tanko Muhammad, and the suspended CJN, Justice Onnoghen. In a 30-paragraphed affidavit that was deposed to by the 1st Plaintiff, the litigants, insisted that President Buhari acted beyond his powers by suspending Onnoghen without recourse to the NJC. “I know as a Nigerian trained Legal Practitioner that the circumstances under which an Acting Chief Justice of Nigeria could be appointed for the Nigerian Federation are limited and do not include the suspension of the holder of that office by an Ex-Parte Order of the Code of Conduct Tribunal emerging from whatever circumstances. “I know as a fact that the 1st Defendant abused his powers and exceeded his constitutional authority when he purported to have suspended the 4th Defendant as the Chief Justice of Nigeria without having recourse to [or by short-circuiting] all known constitutional provisions enclosing the discipline of Judicial officers. “I know that the unconstitutional conduct of the 1st Defendant in purporting to suspend the Chief Justice of Nigeria and unilaterally appointing and swearing in an Acting Chief Justice without the recommendation of the National Judicial Council is extremely offensive to and spiteful of the grundnorm of Nigeria [that is the Constitution], sets a destructive precedence, reeks of utmost bad faith, gravely endangers democracy, undercuts fidelity to Rule of Law, sets a new record in elevated-impunity and desecration of the Constitution with condescending arrogance. “I know that the unconstitutional conduct of the 1st Defendant being impugned herein has set off manifold reaction and shocked the conscience of democrats across the globe as exemplified by the reactions of European Union Mission, United Kingdom and United States of America Missions in Nigeria who issued statements expressing deep concerns regarding the grave development has drawn wide-spread criticisms by Nigerian citizens. “I know as a fact that there is the urgent need for this Honourable Court to speedily review and pronounce on the Constitutionality or otherwise of the actions of the 2nd Defendant which are now threatening the foundation of our democracy. “I know as a fact that despite the unconstitutionality/illegality of the 1st Defendant’s action from which the 3rd Defendant is benefitting from, the 3rd Defendant has commenced performing functions pertaining to the Office of the Chief Justice of Nigeria by purporting to have sworn in Two Hundred and Fifty (250) Election Petition Tribunal Judges on 26th day of January, 2019. “Being a lawyer and a Nigerian citizen, I know as a fact: That the actions of the 1st Defendant being challenged is capable of destroying all what an independent judiciary stands for, create and blossom the culture of impunity and recklessness in public governance and ultimately compromise electoral justice. “That the action of the 1st Defendant that eventuated in the present suit is a grave affront on the sacred doctrine of separation of powers trenchantly consecrated in our Constitution. “In the event the law loses its respect and becomes incapable of commanding obedience (which the action of the 1st Defendant herein precipitates), our Judiciary will fall into odium and disuse thereby opening the floodgate of anarchy, large-scale impunity and erosion of fundamental human rights of citizens. “The actions of the 1st Defendant being impugned herein is capable of putting the Nigerian democracy on a dangerous cliff and eroding the confidence of a common man in the hallowed institution of the Judiciary as his last hope.,” If our democracy crumbles, the Plaintiff’s only source of livelihood (which is the Legal Profession) will be eclipsed, the Courts will close down, citizens will have no place to get reliefs against executive impunity, lawlessness and high-handedness. “There is extremely compelling urgency for this Honourable Court to swiftly intervene to clear the cobwebs by making decisive and clear pronouncements as to the extent of the powers of all the 1st Defendant as it relates to the disciplining of Judicial Officers in Nigeria. “Time is of the essence of this application”, the deponent added. Meantime, the Mr. Danladi Umar-led tribunal said its decision to suspend Justice Onnoghen’s trial was based on the order of the Court of Appeal in Abuja. “Inview of the Court of Appeal order for stay of proceedings and out of respect for the Court of Appeal, the tribunal hereby adjourn this matter sine-die (indefinitely) pending the determination of the Appeal before the Court of Appeal”, Mr. Umar ruled. Only the CCT Chairman and the third member of the panel, Mrs. Julie Amabo, attended the sitting. The second member of the panel, Mr. William Agwadza Atedze, was absent. It will be recalled that Mr. Atedze had openly disagreed with the Tribunal’s Chairman over the procedure adopted in trial of the suspended CJN. Whereas the Chairman, Umar, relied on section 306 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015, to reject a motion Justice Onnoghen filed for the tribunal to suspend his trial and await the outcome of his appeal. On the other hand, Mr. Atedze, relied on section 287(3) of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, and plethora of Supreme Court decided cases, to insist that the CCT panel ought to have respected four different interim injunctions that restrained all the parties, including the tribunal, from taking further steps in the matter. In Atedze’s absence, the CCT Chairman, Umar and Amabor, on January 23, issued the ex-parte order President Muhammadu Buhari relied upon to suspend Onnoghen and appoint Justice Tanko Muhammad as the Acting CJN. At the resumed sitting of the CCT on Monday, government lawyer, Mr. Musa Ibrahim, drew attention of the tribunal to an order the Court of Appeal made on January 24. “Ordinarily, the matter was adjourned till today for hearing of the preliminary objection filed by the defendant. But in view of the order from the Court of Appeal, we will be asking for an adjournment pending the ruling of the Court of Appeal”, Musa submitted. In his response, Mr. Kanu Agabi, SAN, who led nine other Senior Advocates of Nigeria and 38 other lawyers that appeared for the suspended CJN, said he was not opposed to the request for adjournment. l Agabi who did not make any reference to the ex-parte order that empowered President Buhari to suspend the defendant, however expressed his displeasure with refusal of the tribunal to furnish his client with records of its proceedings. “We have been on it since January 23. It is very unfortunate that we have literally been on our knees begging for the record of this tribunal”, Agabi stated. Before he adjourned the case indefinitely, Mr. Umar promised to ensure that the CCT records were made available to counsel to the defendant. Meanwhile, security operatives, on Monday, sealed-off Onnoghen’s chambers at the Supreme Court, even as his administrative staff were barred from having access into any of the offices. This was as the Acting CJN, Muhammad, took over and presided over about 10 cases that came up for hearing before the Supreme Court on Monday. In a related development, a former President of the Nigerian Bar Association, Dr. Olisa Agbakoba (SAN), has submitted a petition before the NJC, asking it to take punitive measures against Justice Muhammad for making himself available to be sworn in as the Acting CJN. Agbakoba urged the legal body to determine the propriety of Justice Muhammad, accepting to be sworn-in to replace the suspended CJN, thereby lending himself to constitutional infraction by the executive arm of government. The former NBA boss noted that Justice Muhammad was part of an NJC panel that sanctioned Justice Obisike Orji of Abia State for allowing himself to be sworn-in as Abia State Chief Judge by the state’s governor without the recommendation of the NJC. Agbakoba’s action came as group of lawyers and Civil Society Organisations, staged a peaceful protest in Abuja to register their dissatisfaction with President Buhari’s action against Onnoghen.

25 Lawyers Drag PMB To Court, Move To Quash Onnoghen’s Suspension

By our correspondent
Twenty Five constitutional lawyers, today dragged President Muhammadu Buhari before the Federal High Court in Abuja to challenge what they termed as illegal suspension of the Chief Justice of Nigeria, CJN, Justice Walter Onnoghen. President Buhari The suit came on a day the Code of Conduct Tribunal, CCT, sitting in Abuja, okayed indefinite adjournment of proceedings in the non assets declaration charge the Federal Government filed against the suspended CJN. The Plaintiffs, led by human rights activist, Mr. Johnmary Jideobi, posed two legal issues for the determination of the court. They prayed the high court to determine, “Whether by the combined interpretation of Section 153(1) (i) paragraph 21(a) of the 3rd Schedule and Sections 271, 291, 292 and 231 of the amended 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria [and especially in view of the Supreme Court decision in Elelu-Habeeb vs. AGF (2012) 13 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 1318);], there exists any authority in the 1st Defendant (Buhari) to suspend the 4th Defendant (Onnoghen) as the Chief Justice of Nigeria? As well as, “Whether by the combined interpretation of Section 153(1) (i) paragraph 21(a) of the 3rd Schedule and Sections 271, 291, 292 and 231 of the amended 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria [and especially in view of the Supreme Court decision in Elelu-Habeeb vs. AGF (2012) 13 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 1318);] the purported suspension of the 4th Defendant as the Chief Justice of Nigeria by the 1st Defendant on the 25th January, 2019 is not unconstitutional?”. Upon determination of the questions, the Plaintiffs, asked the court to hold that President Buhari lacked the constitutional power to suspend Onnoghen as the CJN. “A Declaration of this Honourable Court that by the combined interpretation of Section 153(1) (i) paragraph 21(a) of the 3rd Schedule and Sections 271, 291, 292 and 231 of the amended 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria [and especially in view of the Supreme Court decision in Elelu-Habeeb vs. AGF (2012) 13 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 1318);] the purported suspension of the 4th Defendant as the Chief Justice of Nigeria by the 1st Defendant on the 25th January, 2019 is of no legal force, unconstitutional and a nullity. “An orders of this honourable court quashing and setting aside [as being unconstitutional and of no legal force] the purported suspension of the 4th Defendant by the 1st Defendant. “An order of this honourable court restoring the 4th Defendant forthwith to his office as the Chief Justice of Nigeria. Likewise, “An order of perpetual injunction of this honorable court restraining the 1st Defendant or any other person acting on his behalf or at his direction from further suspending the 4th Defendant from his office as the Chief Justice of Nigeria”. READ ALSO: The CJN in the political arena Aside President Buhari, other Defendants in the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/113/2019, were the National Judicial Council, NJC, the Acting CJN, Justice Tanko Muhammad, and the suspended CJN, Justice Onnoghen. In a 30-paragraphed affidavit that was deposed to by the 1st Plaintiff, the litigants, insisted that President Buhari acted beyond his powers by suspending Onnoghen without recourse to the NJC. “I know as a Nigerian trained Legal Practitioner that the circumstances under which an Acting Chief Justice of Nigeria could be appointed for the Nigerian Federation are limited and do not include the suspension of the holder of that office by an Ex-Parte Order of the Code of Conduct Tribunal emerging from whatever circumstances. “I know as a fact that the 1st Defendant abused his powers and exceeded his constitutional authority when he purported to have suspended the 4th Defendant as the Chief Justice of Nigeria without having recourse to [or by short-circuiting] all known constitutional provisions enclosing the discipline of Judicial officers. “I know that the unconstitutional conduct of the 1st Defendant in purporting to suspend the Chief Justice of Nigeria and unilaterally appointing and swearing in an Acting Chief Justice without the recommendation of the National Judicial Council is extremely offensive to and spiteful of the grundnorm of Nigeria [that is the Constitution], sets a destructive precedence, reeks of utmost bad faith, gravely endangers democracy, undercuts fidelity to Rule of Law, sets a new record in elevated-impunity and desecration of the Constitution with condescending arrogance. “I know that the unconstitutional conduct of the 1st Defendant being impugned herein has set off manifold reaction and shocked the conscience of democrats across the globe as exemplified by the reactions of European Union Mission, United Kingdom and United States of America Missions in Nigeria who issued statements expressing deep concerns regarding the grave development has drawn wide-spread criticisms by Nigerian citizens. “I know as a fact that there is the urgent need for this Honourable Court to speedily review and pronounce on the Constitutionality or otherwise of the actions of the 2nd Defendant which are now threatening the foundation of our democracy. “I know as a fact that despite the unconstitutionality/illegality of the 1st Defendant’s action from which the 3rd Defendant is benefitting from, the 3rd Defendant has commenced performing functions pertaining to the Office of the Chief Justice of Nigeria by purporting to have sworn in Two Hundred and Fifty (250) Election Petition Tribunal Judges on 26th day of January, 2019. “Being a lawyer and a Nigerian citizen, I know as a fact: That the actions of the 1st Defendant being challenged is capable of destroying all what an independent judiciary stands for, create and blossom the culture of impunity and recklessness in public governance and ultimately compromise electoral justice. “That the action of the 1st Defendant that eventuated in the present suit is a grave affront on the sacred doctrine of separation of powers trenchantly consecrated in our Constitution. “In the event the law loses its respect and becomes incapable of commanding obedience (which the action of the 1st Defendant herein precipitates), our Judiciary will fall into odium and disuse thereby opening the floodgate of anarchy, large-scale impunity and erosion of fundamental human rights of citizens. “The actions of the 1st Defendant being impugned herein is capable of putting the Nigerian democracy on a dangerous cliff and eroding the confidence of a common man in the hallowed institution of the Judiciary as his last hope.,” If our democracy crumbles, the Plaintiff’s only source of livelihood (which is the Legal Profession) will be eclipsed, the Courts will close down, citizens will have no place to get reliefs against executive impunity, lawlessness and high-handedness. “There is extremely compelling urgency for this Honourable Court to swiftly intervene to clear the cobwebs by making decisive and clear pronouncements as to the extent of the powers of all the 1st Defendant as it relates to the disciplining of Judicial Officers in Nigeria. “Time is of the essence of this application”, the deponent added. Meantime, the Mr. Danladi Umar-led tribunal said its decision to suspend Justice Onnoghen’s trial was based on the order of the Court of Appeal in Abuja. “Inview of the Court of Appeal order for stay of proceedings and out of respect for the Court of Appeal, the tribunal hereby adjourn this matter sine-die (indefinitely) pending the determination of the Appeal before the Court of Appeal”, Mr. Umar ruled. Only the CCT Chairman and the third member of the panel, Mrs. Julie Amabo, attended the sitting. The second member of the panel, Mr. William Agwadza Atedze, was absent. It will be recalled that Mr. Atedze had openly disagreed with the Tribunal’s Chairman over the procedure adopted in trial of the suspended CJN. Whereas the Chairman, Umar, relied on section 306 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015, to reject a motion Justice Onnoghen filed for the tribunal to suspend his trial and await the outcome of his appeal. On the other hand, Mr. Atedze, relied on section 287(3) of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, and plethora of Supreme Court decided cases, to insist that the CCT panel ought to have respected four different interim injunctions that restrained all the parties, including the tribunal, from taking further steps in the matter. In Atedze’s absence, the CCT Chairman, Umar and Amabor, on January 23, issued the ex-parte order President Muhammadu Buhari relied upon to suspend Onnoghen and appoint Justice Tanko Muhammad as the Acting CJN. At the resumed sitting of the CCT on Monday, government lawyer, Mr. Musa Ibrahim, drew attention of the tribunal to an order the Court of Appeal made on January 24. “Ordinarily, the matter was adjourned till today for hearing of the preliminary objection filed by the defendant. But in view of the order from the Court of Appeal, we will be asking for an adjournment pending the ruling of the Court of Appeal”, Musa submitted. In his response, Mr. Kanu Agabi, SAN, who led nine other Senior Advocates of Nigeria and 38 other lawyers that appeared for the suspended CJN, said he was not opposed to the request for adjournment. l Agabi who did not make any reference to the ex-parte order that empowered President Buhari to suspend the defendant, however expressed his displeasure with refusal of the tribunal to furnish his client with records of its proceedings. “We have been on it since January 23. It is very unfortunate that we have literally been on our knees begging for the record of this tribunal”, Agabi stated. Before he adjourned the case indefinitely, Mr. Umar promised to ensure that the CCT records were made available to counsel to the defendant. Meanwhile, security operatives, on Monday, sealed-off Onnoghen’s chambers at the Supreme Court, even as his administrative staff were barred from having access into any of the offices. This was as the Acting CJN, Muhammad, took over and presided over about 10 cases that came up for hearing before the Supreme Court on Monday. In a related development, a former President of the Nigerian Bar Association, Dr. Olisa Agbakoba (SAN), has submitted a petition before the NJC, asking it to take punitive measures against Justice Muhammad for making himself available to be sworn in as the Acting CJN. Agbakoba urged the legal body to determine the propriety of Justice Muhammad, accepting to be sworn-in to replace the suspended CJN, thereby lending himself to constitutional infraction by the executive arm of government. The former NBA boss noted that Justice Muhammad was part of an NJC panel that sanctioned Justice Obisike Orji of Abia State for allowing himself to be sworn-in as Abia State Chief Judge by the state’s governor without the recommendation of the NJC. Agbakoba’s action came as group of lawyers and Civil Society Organisations, staged a peaceful protest in Abuja to register their dissatisfaction with President Buhari’s action against Onnoghen.

25 Lawyers Drag PMB To Court, Move To Quash Onnoghen’s Suspension

By our correspondent
Twenty Five constitutional lawyers, today dragged President Muhammadu Buhari before the Federal High Court in Abuja to challenge what they termed as illegal suspension of the Chief Justice of Nigeria, CJN, Justice Walter Onnoghen. President Buhari The suit came on a day the Code of Conduct Tribunal, CCT, sitting in Abuja, okayed indefinite adjournment of proceedings in the non assets declaration charge the Federal Government filed against the suspended CJN. The Plaintiffs, led by human rights activist, Mr. Johnmary Jideobi, posed two legal issues for the determination of the court. They prayed the high court to determine, “Whether by the combined interpretation of Section 153(1) (i) paragraph 21(a) of the 3rd Schedule and Sections 271, 291, 292 and 231 of the amended 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria [and especially in view of the Supreme Court decision in Elelu-Habeeb vs. AGF (2012) 13 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 1318);], there exists any authority in the 1st Defendant (Buhari) to suspend the 4th Defendant (Onnoghen) as the Chief Justice of Nigeria? As well as, “Whether by the combined interpretation of Section 153(1) (i) paragraph 21(a) of the 3rd Schedule and Sections 271, 291, 292 and 231 of the amended 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria [and especially in view of the Supreme Court decision in Elelu-Habeeb vs. AGF (2012) 13 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 1318);] the purported suspension of the 4th Defendant as the Chief Justice of Nigeria by the 1st Defendant on the 25th January, 2019 is not unconstitutional?”. Upon determination of the questions, the Plaintiffs, asked the court to hold that President Buhari lacked the constitutional power to suspend Onnoghen as the CJN. “A Declaration of this Honourable Court that by the combined interpretation of Section 153(1) (i) paragraph 21(a) of the 3rd Schedule and Sections 271, 291, 292 and 231 of the amended 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria [and especially in view of the Supreme Court decision in Elelu-Habeeb vs. AGF (2012) 13 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 1318);] the purported suspension of the 4th Defendant as the Chief Justice of Nigeria by the 1st Defendant on the 25th January, 2019 is of no legal force, unconstitutional and a nullity. “An orders of this honourable court quashing and setting aside [as being unconstitutional and of no legal force] the purported suspension of the 4th Defendant by the 1st Defendant. “An order of this honourable court restoring the 4th Defendant forthwith to his office as the Chief Justice of Nigeria. Likewise, “An order of perpetual injunction of this honorable court restraining the 1st Defendant or any other person acting on his behalf or at his direction from further suspending the 4th Defendant from his office as the Chief Justice of Nigeria”. READ ALSO: The CJN in the political arena Aside President Buhari, other Defendants in the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/113/2019, were the National Judicial Council, NJC, the Acting CJN, Justice Tanko Muhammad, and the suspended CJN, Justice Onnoghen. In a 30-paragraphed affidavit that was deposed to by the 1st Plaintiff, the litigants, insisted that President Buhari acted beyond his powers by suspending Onnoghen without recourse to the NJC. “I know as a Nigerian trained Legal Practitioner that the circumstances under which an Acting Chief Justice of Nigeria could be appointed for the Nigerian Federation are limited and do not include the suspension of the holder of that office by an Ex-Parte Order of the Code of Conduct Tribunal emerging from whatever circumstances. “I know as a fact that the 1st Defendant abused his powers and exceeded his constitutional authority when he purported to have suspended the 4th Defendant as the Chief Justice of Nigeria without having recourse to [or by short-circuiting] all known constitutional provisions enclosing the discipline of Judicial officers. “I know that the unconstitutional conduct of the 1st Defendant in purporting to suspend the Chief Justice of Nigeria and unilaterally appointing and swearing in an Acting Chief Justice without the recommendation of the National Judicial Council is extremely offensive to and spiteful of the grundnorm of Nigeria [that is the Constitution], sets a destructive precedence, reeks of utmost bad faith, gravely endangers democracy, undercuts fidelity to Rule of Law, sets a new record in elevated-impunity and desecration of the Constitution with condescending arrogance. “I know that the unconstitutional conduct of the 1st Defendant being impugned herein has set off manifold reaction and shocked the conscience of democrats across the globe as exemplified by the reactions of European Union Mission, United Kingdom and United States of America Missions in Nigeria who issued statements expressing deep concerns regarding the grave development has drawn wide-spread criticisms by Nigerian citizens. “I know as a fact that there is the urgent need for this Honourable Court to speedily review and pronounce on the Constitutionality or otherwise of the actions of the 2nd Defendant which are now threatening the foundation of our democracy. “I know as a fact that despite the unconstitutionality/illegality of the 1st Defendant’s action from which the 3rd Defendant is benefitting from, the 3rd Defendant has commenced performing functions pertaining to the Office of the Chief Justice of Nigeria by purporting to have sworn in Two Hundred and Fifty (250) Election Petition Tribunal Judges on 26th day of January, 2019. “Being a lawyer and a Nigerian citizen, I know as a fact: That the actions of the 1st Defendant being challenged is capable of destroying all what an independent judiciary stands for, create and blossom the culture of impunity and recklessness in public governance and ultimately compromise electoral justice. “That the action of the 1st Defendant that eventuated in the present suit is a grave affront on the sacred doctrine of separation of powers trenchantly consecrated in our Constitution. “In the event the law loses its respect and becomes incapable of commanding obedience (which the action of the 1st Defendant herein precipitates), our Judiciary will fall into odium and disuse thereby opening the floodgate of anarchy, large-scale impunity and erosion of fundamental human rights of citizens. “The actions of the 1st Defendant being impugned herein is capable of putting the Nigerian democracy on a dangerous cliff and eroding the confidence of a common man in the hallowed institution of the Judiciary as his last hope.,” If our democracy crumbles, the Plaintiff’s only source of livelihood (which is the Legal Profession) will be eclipsed, the Courts will close down, citizens will have no place to get reliefs against executive impunity, lawlessness and high-handedness. “There is extremely compelling urgency for this Honourable Court to swiftly intervene to clear the cobwebs by making decisive and clear pronouncements as to the extent of the powers of all the 1st Defendant as it relates to the disciplining of Judicial Officers in Nigeria. “Time is of the essence of this application”, the deponent added. Meantime, the Mr. Danladi Umar-led tribunal said its decision to suspend Justice Onnoghen’s trial was based on the order of the Court of Appeal in Abuja. “Inview of the Court of Appeal order for stay of proceedings and out of respect for the Court of Appeal, the tribunal hereby adjourn this matter sine-die (indefinitely) pending the determination of the Appeal before the Court of Appeal”, Mr. Umar ruled. Only the CCT Chairman and the third member of the panel, Mrs. Julie Amabo, attended the sitting. The second member of the panel, Mr. William Agwadza Atedze, was absent. It will be recalled that Mr. Atedze had openly disagreed with the Tribunal’s Chairman over the procedure adopted in trial of the suspended CJN. Whereas the Chairman, Umar, relied on section 306 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015, to reject a motion Justice Onnoghen filed for the tribunal to suspend his trial and await the outcome of his appeal. On the other hand, Mr. Atedze, relied on section 287(3) of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, and plethora of Supreme Court decided cases, to insist that the CCT panel ought to have respected four different interim injunctions that restrained all the parties, including the tribunal, from taking further steps in the matter. In Atedze’s absence, the CCT Chairman, Umar and Amabor, on January 23, issued the ex-parte order President Muhammadu Buhari relied upon to suspend Onnoghen and appoint Justice Tanko Muhammad as the Acting CJN. At the resumed sitting of the CCT on Monday, government lawyer, Mr. Musa Ibrahim, drew attention of the tribunal to an order the Court of Appeal made on January 24. “Ordinarily, the matter was adjourned till today for hearing of the preliminary objection filed by the defendant. But in view of the order from the Court of Appeal, we will be asking for an adjournment pending the ruling of the Court of Appeal”, Musa submitted. In his response, Mr. Kanu Agabi, SAN, who led nine other Senior Advocates of Nigeria and 38 other lawyers that appeared for the suspended CJN, said he was not opposed to the request for adjournment. l Agabi who did not make any reference to the ex-parte order that empowered President Buhari to suspend the defendant, however expressed his displeasure with refusal of the tribunal to furnish his client with records of its proceedings. “We have been on it since January 23. It is very unfortunate that we have literally been on our knees begging for the record of this tribunal”, Agabi stated. Before he adjourned the case indefinitely, Mr. Umar promised to ensure that the CCT records were made available to counsel to the defendant. Meanwhile, security operatives, on Monday, sealed-off Onnoghen’s chambers at the Supreme Court, even as his administrative staff were barred from having access into any of the offices. This was as the Acting CJN, Muhammad, took over and presided over about 10 cases that came up for hearing before the Supreme Court on Monday. In a related development, a former President of the Nigerian Bar Association, Dr. Olisa Agbakoba (SAN), has submitted a petition before the NJC, asking it to take punitive measures against Justice Muhammad for making himself available to be sworn in as the Acting CJN. Agbakoba urged the legal body to determine the propriety of Justice Muhammad, accepting to be sworn-in to replace the suspended CJN, thereby lending himself to constitutional infraction by the executive arm of government. The former NBA boss noted that Justice Muhammad was part of an NJC panel that sanctioned Justice Obisike Orji of Abia State for allowing himself to be sworn-in as Abia State Chief Judge by the state’s governor without the recommendation of the NJC. Agbakoba’s action came as group of lawyers and Civil Society Organisations, staged a peaceful protest in Abuja to register their dissatisfaction with President Buhari’s action against Onnoghen.

Data Of 14,200 HIV Positive People Leaked In Singapore

Confidential data of 14,200 people diagnosed with HIV, mostly foreigners, has been stolen and leaked online in Singapore, authorities said Monday, the second massive data breach in the city-state within months. AIDS SYMBOL An American convicted of numerous crimes is believed to have leaked the information after obtaining it from his partner, a Singaporean doctor with access to the HIV registry, the ministry of health said. It comes after the health records of 1.5 million Singaporeans, including Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, were stolen in a suspected state-sponsored attack in June and July, the country’s biggest ever data breach. “Confidential information regarding 14,200 individuals diagnosed with HIV up to January 2013, and 2,400 of their contacts, is in the possession of an unauthorised person,” the ministry said in a statement. “The information has been illegally disclosed online… We are sorry for the anxiety and distress caused by this incident.” The information includes names, identification numbers, contact details, HIV test results and other medical information. Access to the information has been blocked but it is still in the possession of the person who leaked it — and could be disclosed again, the ministry warned. Those affected are 5,400 Singaporeans diagnosed with HIV up to January 2013, and 8,800 foreigners diagnosed with HIV up to December 2011. Singapore, an affluent city-state of 5.6 million people, is home to many expatriates. The health ministry was notified by police last week that confidential information from the HIV registry may have been disclosed. The data is in the possession of Mikhy K. Farrera Brochez, a male US citizen who lived in Singapore from 2008 to 2016, the ministry said. He was convicted of fraud and drug-related offences in March 2017, and was deported from Singapore after completing his sentence. He is not currently in the city-state, the ministry said, adding that authorities were seeking assistance from their foreign counterparts. Brochez was the partner of Ler Teck Siang, a male Singaporean doctor, who had access to the HIV registry for his work. He was convicted in September of abetting Brochez in criminal activity, and sentenced to 24 months’ imprisonment. He is appealing. Earlier this month, an official inquiry into last year’s breach highlighted a litany of failings, including weaknesses in computer systems, and said authorities believed a state was likely behind the attack.

Anxiety: As Opposition Raises The Alarm Over Plot To Change NASS Leadership

By Lukman Amus
The opposition has alleged that the current wind of change may move from the judiciary to the National Assembly (NASS) this week.premier has learnt.
Speculations that the NASS leadership may be swept became rife since President Muhammadu Buhari suspended Justice Walter Onnoghen last Friday at the request of the Code Conduct Tribunal (CCT).
But the opposition claimed those allegedly plotting the fall of some principal officers of the National Assembly based their stance on such officers having issues relating to asset declaration, which led to Onnoghen’s fall.
The opposition parties and coalition, yesterday, alerted Nigerians of fresh plots to remove the Senate President, Dr. Bukola Saraki and the Deputy Senate President, Senator Ike Ekweremadu. The two principal officers had asset declaration issues raised against them. Even though Saraki has been cleared by the Supreme Court, those allegedly pushing for his removal, argued that he is not a “sacred cow.”
For the House of Representatives Speaker, Hon. Yakubu Dogara, his traducers want him to go for allegedly turning to a pain on the neck of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Bauchi State.
Dogara is reported to have formed a coalition with other political parties to ensure the defeat of governor Mohammed Abubakar of Bauchi State at the forthcoming governorship election.
Ahead of the National Assembly reconvening to deliberate on Onnoghen’s suspension by the president, the Coalition of United Political Parties (CUPP) said it has uncovered plot to impeach the leadership of NASS on Tuesday in order to forestall the federal legislature’s debate on Onnoghen’s fate.
At a press conference in Abuja, CUPP’s spokesman, Ikenga Ugochinyere, said that the plot was being hatched by the All Progressives Congress (APC) leadership in conjunction with some of the ruling party’s lawmakers.
He said that the plan to sack the National Assembly leadership involved ensuring that Saraki, Dogara, and Ekweremadu are prevented from entering the NASS complex tomorrow.
Ugochinyere claimed that some APC senators had been mobilised for the action with the sum of $70, 000 each while their counterparts in the House of Representatives were given $40, 000 each.
He hinted the CUPP would mobilise to the National Assembly complex as early as 6am tomorrow to ensure that the plotters do not succeed with their plan.
He said: “The CUPP is once again raising alarm having received incontrovertible facts over a fresh plot that has been hatched and which has received the go-ahead nod of President Muhammadu Buhari for a violent, undemocratic, unlawful, illegal and demonic takeover of the leadership of both chambers of the National Assembly on Tuesday, 29th January, 2019.
“The APC-led federal government is of the firm belief that Tuesday is their best and last chance to effect the changes as their control of the judiciary will be put to use to ensure there is no reversal of justice for the present occupants.
“The Senate will reconvene on Tuesday to discuss the suspension of the CJN, Justice Walter Onnoghen by President Muhammadu Buhari.
“The APC is ready to do whatever they want and destroy the very fulcrum of our constitutional democracy on Tuesday and have vowed, ‘it is tomorrow or never’. The judicial coup which they believed was supposed to be more difficult went very easily beyond their imagination hence the need to complete the takeover of the National Assembly immediately so that the distraction of the election campaigns will be put to use,” CUPP said.
Ugochinyere added that the government had resolved to make some major positive announcements today to deflect the minds of Nigerians from the move on Tuesday.
According to him, Senator Ahmed Lawan will be announced as “the Senate President, Senator Hope Uzodimma as the Deputy Senate President and Senator Godswill Akpabio as the Senate Leader.
“While in the House of Representatives, Hon. Femi Gbajabiamila will be announced as the Speaker of the House and Hon, Abdulmimin Jibrin will be made the Deputy Speaker.”
The CUPP spokesman further said that “to ensure the plot goes successfully, the federal government has mapped out the sum of $70, 000 for each Senator and $40, 000 for each House member for what it called welfare since majority of them will be compelled to be in town suddenly.”
The alleged bribes, he asserted, had been forwarded for distribution to the APC lawmakers as they return to their chambers, adding that “the money amounting to $15million ($8million for the House and $7 million for the Senate) was sourced from the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC), the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA), the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA), a commercial bank and a company owned by a member of the alleged cabal in the presidency.
“Nigerians are hereby put on notice that these coupists are plotting that Senators Saraki, Ekweremmadu, Ben Bruce, Dino Melaye, Abiodun Olujimi, Dogara, Hon. Kingsley Chinda, Hon. Nnena Ukeje among others would be stopped by security agents from gaining entrance into the National Assembly.
“Thugs have been mobilised from Plateau, Kwara and Kogi States to mount protest at the gates of the National Assembly and have the approval to attack and disperse any group that come to hold a counter rally.
“We hereby reiterate our call; if you are sleeping- wake up! If you are eating – stop! If you are playing – stop! The political barbarians are knocking on the last door of constitutional governance and democratic rule and are willing to knock it down if we do not resist them. This was how Hitler started!” he said.
CUPP Is A Nebulous Organisation – APC
In a swift reaction, the APC dismissed the CUPP and its allegations of an imminent change in the leadership of the National Assembly, insisting that such an organisation does not exist.
The party, which insisted that it does not respond to a nebulous organisation, added that it would not give credibility to the claim by dignifying same with a response.
APC national publicity secretary, Mallam Lanre Issa-Onilu, told LEADERSHIP last night that there was nothing to react to.
He said: “The APC does not react to such nebulous organisation, we do not react to an organisation that does not exist,” he repeated.
APC Senators Induced To Stop NASS Sanctions On PMB, PDP Insists
Also, the PDP yesterday alleged moves to bribe APC Senators to protect President Buhari from parliamentary sanctions for constitutional breaches and gross misconduct over the controversies surrounding the suspension of Onnoghen.
The party said that based on its intelligence, the presidency has summoned all APC senators to the presidential villa to a meeting tonight, ahead of the Senate’s resumption on Tuesday because it is jittery.
The PDP national publicity, Kola Ologbondiyan, in a statement yesterday, claimed that the Buhari presidency “has been unsettled following national and international outcry over his constitutional breaches, particularly the assault on the judiciary in h
s attempt to forcefully remove Onnoghen and impose a pliable CJN to do his bidding.
“President Buhari is not only apprehensive that the Senate might sanction him for violating the constitution and usurping its statutory duties regarding the handling of issues related to a CJN, the parliament might also open an inquest into how President Buhari, who parades as Mr. Integrity, allegedly procured an order from the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) upon which he announced the illegal suspension of the CJN.
“There are reports that the said order is suspicious and subject to investigation, being not argued or issued in the open court; following which the Buhari Presidency now seeks to undermine the Senate.
“The PDP has been made aware of how money has been moved from the coffers of the NDDC to bribe the APC senators, as well as how each APC senator has been offered huge sums of money in foreign currency to engage in heckling during the session, particularly when the matter is raised.
“However, the PDP wants the APC senators to note that the issue at hand is not partisan, it is not even about Onnoghen, but about nationhood, as well as the protection of our democracy and constitution from despotism,” the PDP said.
Atiku Salutes US, UK, EU For Standing With Nigerians
The presidential Candidate of the PDP and former vice president, Atiku Abubakar, says his condemnation of Onnoghen’s suspension is about preserving the sanctity of the constitution.
He warned that once the Pandora’s Box of unconstitutionality is opened no one can tell where it will end.
Atiku who hailed the international community for standing with the Nigerians over the saga, lampooned those backing the suspension of the CJN and questioned what has changed between 2015 and now when they celebrated a statement from the US/UK/EU calling for free and fair elections in 2015, just after the postponement of the 2015 elections to make room for a final assault against Boko Haram.
He also commended all the Lord Justices of the Supreme Court for not participating in the swearing-in of election petition tribunals, saying that they heeded the call to remain united.
In a statement he personally signed, Atiku said that “since the unconstitutional removal of CJN by President Buhari, there has been some water under the bridge that necessitates a restatement that I still completely and unequivocally reject and condemn that action and any other breach of our constitution.
“I am not fighting for Justice Onnoghen. I am fighting for the constitution. Once we open the Pandora’s Box of unconstitutionality, we cannot tell where it will end.”
Atiku who said that the current scenario appears to him like déjà vu, recalled that under “a particularly brutal military dictatorship, Nigerians witnessed the illegal and arbitrary removal of many innocent people from their positions of authority and many said nothing because they were not from the ethnic group of those affected.”
While he noted that he remembered speaking up then that what we know is when the rain begins, but we do not know when it will end, adding that, “my warnings were ignored by some until they woke up one day and that dictator removed no less a personality than the Sultan of Sokoto.”
Atiku continued: “It is worth pointing out that Muhammadu Buhari was by his side when he did that. He obviously learned very well from his teacher.
“If they come for the heads of the legislature and we keep quiet because we are not legislators, if they came for the heads of the media and we keep quiet because we are not journalists, if they came for the head of the judiciary and we keep quiet because he/she is not from our area, there may be no one left to speak up when they come for us.
“At this point, let me commend all the Lord Justices of the Supreme Court who have heeded my call and the call of other patriots to remain united. The fact that they did not participate in the swearing-in of election petitions tribunals is not lost on true democrats all over the world.
“My thanks especially go to the governments of the United Kingdom, the United States and the European Union for standing shoulder-to-shoulder with the Nigerian people. This is most appreciated and on behalf of the voiceless,” he said.
Onnoghen Ought To Have Resigned – Ajulo
Meanwhile, an Abuja-based lawyer and founder of Egalitarian Mission of Africa, Dr. Kayode Ajulo, has said that Onnoghen ought to have honorably resigned his appointment in the interest of the country.
Ajulo, who is the brain behind Buhari re-election movement, Forward With Buhari (FWB), said that Onnoghen should have bowed out before his suspension from office.
He said: “In more civilised climes, the CJN ought to have resigned but he refused to do so. What you are seeing today is probably because of the office or person involved. Of course, it is expected because most of the senior lawyers today defending what is indefensible may be, have some interests, but I believe that one day we will start interrogating such interests.
“I have received so many calls from my senior colleagues condemning the action of Mr. President and I ask them where in the world do you have CJN with questionable character?
“Again, the CJN in question has admitted to the allegations but he said he forgot. Do you know how many people in this country who have been jailed and are languishing in jails across the country for the same forgetfulness?”
On whether Onnoghen’s suspension is constitutional or otherwise, the lawyer said: “You see, all these depend on narratives and how it is being presented to the general public. I don’t want to believe that the president suspended anybody but he acted according to a court order, and I want to believe that if the court wants anyone suspended, the court has such powers.
“The tribunal is very clear on that and that’s why the president said that having received a true certified copy of the order by the court on the CJN suspension, he had to appoint a new CJN in acting capacity. The purpose of that is that we still have the CJN, my Lord Justice Walter Onnoghen because for you to remove the CJN you need to go through Section 292 of 1999 Constitution or you go ahead with the two-thirds of the Senate.
“That’s why we have to understand this, the CJN is still under suspension, and he has not been removed. So, there’s no need for all these noise I am hearing. In order to put the records straight, once you are facing any disciplinary action, the court has the powers to suspend you, even as a CJN.
“What the president has done is in respect of the court order because he didn’t suspend anyone, it is the court. Whatsoever anyone is saying that the CCT cannot suspend the CJN or make such pronouncement, then such a person has a misunderstanding of our laws. Don’t forget the constitution created the Code of Conduct Tribunal. Part of its duties is to make some orders that have to be followed and that’s the purpose of force of law. And it has to be followed,” Ajulo stated.
Aisha Buhari Denies Condemning Onnoghen’s Suspension
Relatedly, the wife of the president, Aisha Buhari, has denied reports that she condemned the federal government over the suspension of Onnoghen.
In a statement issued by her media aide, Suleiman Haruna, Mrs. Buhari described the purported report as “fake news and untrue”.
Haruna said: “The attention of the wife of the President has been drawn to a post on social media to the effect that she condemned the suspension of the Chief Justice of Nigeria.
“It is important to inform Nigerians that the wife of the
president has not made any public statements on the matter and therefore the commentary is untrue and fake.
“This is highly condemnable and we therefore advise the purveyors of such news to recant and desist henceforth,” he said.

 
 

Friday 25 January 2019

What To Know About Nigeria’s Acting CJN, Ibrahim Tanko Muhammad

President Muhammadu Buhari has appointed Ibrahim Tanko Muhammad as the Acting Chief Justice of Nigeria.
This was sequel to the sacking of ex-CJN Walter Onnoghenon Friday.
The following is what we know about Justice Muhammad, according to his citation on Wikipedia.
  • Justice Muhammad was born on 31 December, 1953 at Doguwa – Giade, a local government area in Bauchi State.
  • He is a Nigerian jurist and Justice of the Supreme Court of Nigeria.
  • He was formerly a Justice of the Nigerian courts of appeal.
  • He attended Government Secondary School, Azare, where he obtained the West Africa School Certificate in 1973 before he later proceeded to Ahmadu Bello University where he received a bachelor’s degree in Law in 1980.
  • He later obtained a Master and Doctorate (PhD) degrees from the same university in 1984 and 1998 respectively.
  • Tanko began his career in 1982, after his Call to Bar in 1981, the same year he graduated from the Nigerian Law School.
  • In 1989, he was appointed as Chief Magistrate of the High Court of Federal Capital Territory, a position he held till 1991 when he became a Judge at the Bauchi State Sharia Court of Appeal.
  • He served in that capacity for two years before he was appointed to the Bench of the Nigerian courts of appeal as Justice in 1993.
  • He held this position for 13 years before he was appointed to the Bench of the Supreme Court of Nigeria in 2006 but was sworn in on January 7, 2007.

Aftermath Of Insurgency: Unimaid Students Narrate Ordeal

The activities of the boko haram sect in Borno State has no doubt, caused havoc in the lives of the people in the state. While the citizens have started to get on with their lives, the aftermath of the crises continues to linger everywhere in the state, including the University of Maiduguri (UniMaid), Borno State. PREMIER,  writes. As students in the country continue to wait for the two elephants, the federal government and the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) to reach an agreement and call off the strike action, students of University of Maiduguri have taken time out to reminisce on the activities of the boko haram sect in the state, which eventually spilled over to their school. Though no bomb blasts have been recorded in the school for quite a while, the students have continued to observe caution as a result of experiences garnered from the insurgency. Students, who are mostly born and brought up  in the city would never have believed that their lives would be turned upside down in their search for education. Twenty five-year-old Emmanuel Ebere, a 400 level Civil engineering student, would never forget the first time he experienced the dreaded boko haram activities in 2014. Emmanuel had just finished his midnight studies in his classroom, when around 3am, he decided to see a female student off to her hostel before heading back to his. “I was seeing a friend off to her hostel after studying, and we were just few meters to where a bomb suddenly exploded. That was the first time I witnessed it in the school compound. We were walking down when we noticed security men flashing torches. We didn’t really know what was happening. We heard shouts and the blast. I wanted to run, when I remembered there was a lady with me. I turned back, grabbed her and we ran to another hostel, far away from the blast. I was shaking. That experience, I will never forget,” he said. He added that though there had been reported blasts in the past that had killed some students and lecturers in the school, the very one he experienced fortunately killed only the suicide bomber who detonated the bomb. Ebere added that like its slogan, Home of Peace, Maiduguri before boko haram struck, was a peaceful place, fun to grow up in and definitely a right place to seek education. “Life in Maiduguri was very peaceful. It was like the normal growing up, not until the boko haram strike. I can still remember that in 2009, boko haram crises started. We were here one Sunday morning, when we started hearing gun shots. The state wasn’t safe any longer especially for us boys and men. If you were a young guy, no matter your age, as far as you are tal, you’re not safe. The military was arresting people at many places. They didn’t ask questions,” he reminisced. Ebere stated that education in a state of insurgency wasn’t an easy one as one had to think not only about studying, but also about being  safe. “It continued happening because the school didn’t have a fence then. It made school boring because you are scared going to class. Reading became difficult. Even in the class, you don’t know who is who. If you see people with Hijab, you just get scared. At a point, my mum asked me to come back home. But I had no choice. I had to return to school to continue my studies,” he said. John Joseph, a 21-year-old Mechanical Engineering had a choice “not to” come to UniMaid but he came. His elder siblings, who graduated from the same school, had encouraged him to seek admission in the school. “Just make sure you are cautious. Don’t go where you are not supposed to be,” they had told the jittery John. John, who is now in his second year, stated he had never regretted getting admission in the school despite the insurgency. “I just heard about the numerous blasts that had occurred in the school. The little I came close to the violence was when I was walking down to the hostel with my friends and we heard multiple gun shots. We were all advised to stay put in our hostels,” he said. John, however, stated that the insurgency has put the students into so much stress as they had to wake up earlier than usual to prepare for lectures due to security check points in the school. “You just have to work with time. You have to get up early in other to meet up with your classes. You have to go through two or three check points because you will be searched. If you have a 7 am lecture, you have to start coming to school like one hour earlier. Again, you have to carry transparent bags or carry your books in your hands. If you have to carry a bag, you should endure the search,” he said. For Christy John who got admission in 2009 when the activities of the sect was ‘hot’, it was a hell of a situation in which she found herself. She was left with a choice of either forfeiting the admission or staying back. She opted to stay back and fight it out. “The crises started like a joke. We were hearing stories of bomb blasts and shootings in some communities in Borno State, until it came down to Maiduguri and to the school. We were warned to be security conscious. It wasn’t easy at all.  We were scared of going to the market. I had to pack all the foodstuff I needed from home because going to the market was a no, no for me,” she said. Christy, who lived in a community close to the campus, called Merikuwiat, stated that they were living in fear then as security was not too tight in the area. “I remember one day, while I was sleeping, I heard a loud bang. It was a bomb blast. I woke up suddenly, it was as if the earth was crashing down on me. It is a day I will never forget,” she said. Another day Christy will never forget was the day she was coming back to school from Yola. She explained that they had arrived before the time for the curfew which was 6pm and the driver had promised to take his passengers, mostly students, to the school. However, they could not get to their destination because when they got to Lagos Bridge in Maiduguri, they saw people abandoning their cars and running as fast as they could to any direction their legs could take them. “The driver told us to find our way as he would not be able to take us to the school. We pleaded with him to take us to the park but the problem was that there was no way to even get to the park. It was just God. We were able to follow through some communities to the park where we passed the night and continued our journey the next day. It wasn’t funny,” she said. The Banking and Finance graduate continues to thank God that after all she passed through, she was able to graduate without being a casualty to the dreaded Boko Haram sect. “My graduation was a huge relief. I was really thankful to God. I know some students had to move to another school. Some who had money went abroad to continue their education. When I left, Maiduguri, I vowed never to come back again,” she said. Christy with all her vows, had, however, found herself back in Maiduguri as she is searching for a job to sustain herself. “I heard I can come here and volunteer with an NGO. With the economic situation, to get a job is a problem so I am back here. Thank God the situation, even though is not far from ending, has subsided,” she said. Though the Northeast is not yet out of the woods when it comes to the boko baram attack, the students are happy that the insurgents were not able to penetrate the school which might have led to the closure of the school. “We are proud that we are making progress. It shows that the military and the school security did and are doing their best,” John stated. He added that for him, the insurgents have not in any way decreased the number of  students seeking admission in the school, which he said shows that ‘education’ is still winning. “The standard of education in UniMaid hasn’t dropped. People will tell you to just get the admission and be alert. I think the standard is what people are looking at. People do not mind getting the best education, even with the stress. Our medical college still remains one of the be