NIGERIA ON THE BRINK OF CIVIL WAR, CHIBOK SAGA IS A HOAX BY ABDULMUMINI ADEKU

NIGERIA ON THE BRINK OF CIVIL WAR, CHIBOK SAGA IS A HOAX

BY ABDULMUMINI ADEKU

……………………..SABOTAGE THREATENS NATION’S FUTURE

……………………..AMERICA MAY GIVE NIGERIA NEW CONDITIONS ON PRESENCE OF

MILITARY BASE, ACCEPTANCE OF GAY MARRIAGE

……………………….IMPERIALSTS MAY TIE NEW MOVES TO FOREIGN AIDS WORTH

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS  ANNUALLY.

……………………………IF NIGERIA DOES NOT NEGOTIATE CHIBOK BABES WILL DIE

…………………………….U.S.FRANCE, ISREAL HAVE NEGOTITAED UNDERGROUND

IN THE PAST BUT USE THE MEDIA AS A PROPAGANDA TOOL TO MAKE THE ACT

LOOK WRONG.

……………………………BOKO HARAM IS FOREVER,OVER 50 MILLION NIGERIANS

ARE MEMBERS

…………………………….GOVT URGED TO CUT FOOD SUPPLIES,CHANGE THE NAIRA,

BLOCK LEGAL AND ILLEGAL FOREIGN EXCHANGE

………………………….AZAZI INDICTED PDP BASED ON CREDIBLE SECURITY EVIDENCE AS

NSA

………………………….WHO ORDERED AZAZI’S ASSASSINATION?

Will this bunch of saboteurs place their oath to the nation ahead of religious sentiments?

Are you one of those who earnestly believe that the allied force presence in Nigeria will heal it of its terrorism scourge ,well if you belong to that school of thought  then you may have to do a rethink or reality check .

Everywhere you to in Nigeria this days around the world one message seems to be very clear ,LET-THE-GIRLS-GO but are we now saying that those kidnapped girls are more vital than all the victims of the sporadic attacks of Boko Haram.

What most people do not seems to realize is that in global politics things do not happen by some form of accident but are actually programmed to happen by some higher terrestrial forces.

While Nigeria has been burning all this years ,the United States and its allied partners did not discuss the issue of coming to our shores because they were waiting for the right time.

Do a total recall and you will remember how they begged to set up an African High Command off the coast of Nigeria to keep an eye of there assets but Former President Olusegun Obasanjo rejected this plea.

Since then Boko Haram which started as a rag -tag religious movement have become seriously emboldened to the extent that their group now seems to have overwhelmed the Nigerian Armed Forces  due largely to internal sabotage.

How did the FREE-OUR-GIRLS-CAMPAIGN  start you may want to query, but the fact is that protests are never done on empty stomach  as  vested interests from Europe and America funded the project because of the plans to invade Nigeria for its vast resources just like  they did in Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq ,Libya, Egypt, Congo Kinshasa,Angola and so many more.

America and her partners will not give you anything without something in return.

Miss Anino Aganbi ,a political reporter with The Vanguard Newspapers told Paedia Exzpress Multimedia in a terse reply that Nigeria was in deep trouble.

Mr Dotun Atilade,a global peace and conflict advocate told this reporter that whoever does not want America in her shores should learn  to do the right thing but quickly added that nothing goes nothing.

Another source speaks:”They will try to see what they can do on the Chibok saga but they will give us some stringent ,we said we did not want a military barrack in the Gulf of Guinea now we will have to accept it”

“we said we will not legalize gay marriage ,now men will have to agree to sleep with animals  as there will soon be a policy reversal as we will soon eat our words,they will tie all of this conditions with new foreign aids and billions of dollars”

This reporter once anchored a report in which he exclusively revealed how France takes at least 60 percent of the resources and annual revenues of its 32 former colonies in Africa out of the continents 54 nations.

A security Source while appraising the situation recently told Paedia Express Multimedia in Lagos, Nigeria recently about how the military was now divided along religious  lines  and had forgotten there oath of service and allegiance which they pleaded to Nigeria when they were employed in the military.

The source while rejecting national integration under the present circumstance enjoined the government to as a matter of urgency send Christian soldiers and moderate moslems who are not from the North to the North East war torn zone as anything to the alternative will continue to lead to sabotage.

He was shocked that Kaduna based civil rights leader, Mr Sani Shehu   does not seems to see anything wrong in the terror groups actions as he was always in the mould of asking the government for a soft landing for them and wondered if he was a member of the out lawed group.

He revealed to this reporter about how Boko Haram leader, Abubakar Shekau was recently sighted at a wedding with his convoy and nothing was done to stop the event.

He lashed out at leaders in the Northern block  who say something in the press but go into their closets to do something very different.

Executive Director ,Center for Constitutionalism and Demilitarization, Mr Lucky Irene Akhaine said Nigeria was history as far as he was concerned and affirmed that if the statement that Nigeria will collapse in 2015 as a project should be taken very seriously especially if it came through somebody who had the backing of the White House in Washington D.C.

His words:”America will not give you something without taking something in return, are you aware that they now screen sour soldiers in the North East,this was one of the reasons General Victor Malu resigned from service as he told Obasanjo point blank that he could not take orders from America”

“Nigeria is history as far as am concerned,they have said that Nigeria will break up by 2015 and now Jonathan has used the Chibok girls kidnap to play into there hands”

Another analyst pleaded with the government to change our currency,the naira immediately  as this was the way we killed off Biafra

His words:”we should analyze the way Boko Haram get their money for operations, I hear that they pay them at least $8,000 each to recruit them but I tell you that if we block all of this they will be defeated and they will surrender as they will not be able to buy food ,medical supplies”

The source also advised the government to as a matter of urgency ban all foreign exchange activities when the naira is changed till such a time the insurgency has been curtailed as most of the Bureau De Change are owned by people who may be sympathetic to the terror group.

Another source told this reporter that one of his pals who was a security officer at the Lagos abattoir in Oko-Oba in Lagos recently left them and relocated to Borno State to join Boko Haram.

According to him when the Boko Haram member was picked up recently by government agents in the North Eastern region he had up to five million naira in his personal bank account.

It would be recalled that General Patrick Azazi,Former National Security Adviser had hit the nail on the head when he told the entire world that the security crisis caused by the insurgency  was due to the political lock jam within the ruling Peoples Democratic Party[P.D.P] and for a man of his caliber not known to utter idle statements on account of his training a lot of Nigerian believed him.

Not quite long after he was removed from  office and shortly after he was killed in a helicopter crash alongside, Sir Patrick Yakowa,a Northern Christian the former Governor of Kaduna State but up till date the nation has not been told the real truth of what took place inside the engines of the helicopter does leading to Germaine insinuations that the duo were eliminated deliberately.

Another lamented the rip-off situation in Chibok and wondred why the nation had several leaders bereft of ideas.

His words:”If any of those girls was Jonathan’s relative or biological daughter will he not negotiate with Boko Haram,the fact is that he can only talking very tough but I tell you if he does negotiate with them they will kill all those girls in there custody and nothing will happen as they are willing to die anyway”

“worst case scenario ,by the time they kill every insurgent at Sambissa Forest they will see the decaying corpse of those girls, America, France and the United Kingdom will tell you that they do not negotiate publicly with terrorists but this is not true as they do this underground”

“it is obvious that our people do not have an understanding of international politics”

Yet another source accused The Presidency of playing politics with the deadly affair of Chibok by failing to reveal the true identities of the sponsors of Boko Haram as at press time.

He accused President Goodluck Jonathan of holding the names of the sponsors to his chest because of his 2015 presidential ambitions as he will need support from the Northern political block.

Analysts will now hope that The Presidency will now come down from its high horse and negotiate to save the hapless girls from chibok from the demons at Sambissa forest.

Some security experts that Paedia Express Multimedia confided in also pointed out that implants which can help the nation to track terror suspects should be placed inside the body of the suspect before they swapped for the Chibok girls still in captivity as at press time.

According to America’s public affairs and military strategists,Juan Cole the  United States has negotiated with Terrorists and Amnestied Them all through History

The GOP talking points in response to the release of Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl in a trade for five former officials of the 1990s Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan (Taliban) focused on a few basic premises. !. You don’t negotiate with terrorists; 2. such a swap would encourage terrorists to capture Americans; 3. these officials are the worst the worst.

Tagging movements as “terrorist” and then refusing to deal with them is frankly stupid. The Taliban in Afghanistan are not a small terrorist group like, say, the Italian Red Brigades of the 1970s and 1980s. They are guerrillas belonging to a movement that at one point had captured the state and run it. The Taliban are now a guerrilla group, holding territory.

The US has all along negotiated with the guerrillas it has fought on the battlefield. William Howard Taft (later president) in the Philippines was all for negotiation with Filipinos who rejected US rule, and he created “attraction zones” to win them over. At the conclusion of the Aguinaldo resistance to US occupation in 1902, Teddy Roosevelt declared a general amnesty for the resistance fighters. These resistance fighters had committed some atrocities, including on captured US troops, but Roosevelt just let them walk free. Talk softly, carry a big stick, and let all the terrorists go, seems to have been his motto.

The US negotiated with the Viet Cong in South Vietnam, who were very much analogous to the Taliban and whom the US would now certainly term “terrorists.” In 1973, the US used intermediaries to negotiate with the Viet Cong for release of captured US soldiers at Loc Ninh. Americans on the political right made a huge issue about 1300 US soldiers never having been released by the Viet Cong (only about 400 were), and the shame that these men were left on the battlefield by the Nixon and Ford administrations. Conservatives seem to want to have it both ways. If you negotiate the release of US captives with the enemy you are “negotiating with terrorists.” If you don’t, then you have left soldiers behind on the battlefield. The fact is that the only way to have freed them was to have offered something for them in detailed negotiations. As for the Viet Cong “terrorists,” many of them are in government now and the US has cordial relations with them.

In the 1980s radical Shiites in Lebanon took American hostages. In order to free them, the Reagan administration not only negotiated with Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini but actually stole T.O.W. anti-aircraft munitions from Pentagon warehouses and shipped them to Tehran, receiving the money for them in black bank accounts and sending it to right wing death squads in Nicaragua. Khomeini and his government were listed as terrorists by the State Department at the time, and selling weapons to Iran was highly illegal. Not only that, but the US was allied with Iraq at the time, so Reagan screwed over Baghdad this way. Reagan did it, in part to free US hostages in Lebanon (Iran put pressure on its clients for their release).

As for encouraging groups to take US hostages, if the GOP really is so worried about this outcome they should stop putting the idea in the minds of terrorists by trumpeting it all over the news media. There was no rash of hostage-taking of Americans after Reagan bribed Iran to have them released, so the expectation is ahistorical.

The Israelis did a prisoner swap, at 1000 to one, for Gilad Shalit, and it hasn’t caused more Israelis to be captured. Why do right wing Americans only hold up Israel as a model when it acts unwisely, rather than when it (as it often does) acts pragmatically?

In fact, groups like the Taliban are always trying to take US personnel captive. Every day all day. This agreement changes nothing. The reason they only had one American in captivity was not the US policy of not negotiating. It is because guerrilla groups find it difficult to kidnap people from hardened bases and other such relatively secure facilities.

Finally, as for the 5 Taliban officials being the worst of the worst, that is probably true. However, there are other worst of the worst out there– big Afghan warlords of the 1990s with massive amounts of blood on their hands– whom the US has left alone to operate freely in Afghanistan. Gen. Rashid Dostam was even a vice presidential candidate, and Abu Sayyaf serves in parliament. Look them up. US politicians appear not so interested in who committed

massacres but in whether they are presently cooperative with the Karzai government.