LEGAL WAR TEARS THE PREMIER NEWSPAPERS APART

LEGAL WAR TEARS THE PREMIER NEWSPAPERS APART

………………………….WUSU AND CO  DEFENDANTS

 CONTINUE TO RUN AWAY FROM COURT SESSIONS

………………………..CO OPTS COURT BAILIFF INTO EVIL

 SCHEMES

………………………………COURT BAILIFF, DEFENDANTS LAWYER

T0 FACE CHARGES FOR IMPERSONATION

………………………………IMPERSONATION IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE THAT

 CARRIES A JAIL TERM

……………………………..HEARING FIXED FOR 3^RD DECEMBER,2014

………………………………JUDGEMENT DATE TO BE FIXED AFTER

BY ABDULMUMINI ADEKU.

MR BABATUNJI ISMAILA WUSU,CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,ROOBS COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK LIMITED IS URGENTLY NEEDED AT THE NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL COURT TO ANSWER CHARGES LEVELED AGAINST HIM IN A LAW SUIT

The Premier Newspapers, trading under the name of Roobs Communications Network Limited is currently been rocked by the pains and burden of a multi million naira law suit against it.

Investigations and checks on the issue by Paedia Express Multimedia in Lagos,Nigeria shows that the case which has been officially gazette at NICN/LA/355/2014 is been prevented from being heard by the National Industrial Court due to some under hand and dubious tactics by the court bailiff.

Legal fireworks in the case which was filed by this reporter owning to the clear refusal of the management of Roobs Communications Network Limited to pay his salaries while working for them actually started on the 27^th of October ,2014 when the case came up for mention at the court.

Due to the absence of the defendant and his legal team who were said to have been served by the court by Justice Medinat. O.O.Oyewunmi ,the case was adjourned for 12^th November,2014 with the defendant and his legal team again not in court.

On scrutiny of legal documentations ,it was discovered that the court bailiff hade served the defendants lawyer in his opebi, Lagos office during the first notice sent out by the courts, then on the second occasion he had sent it to the defendants office in Ogba, Lagos, Nigeria which is a clear violation of legal ethics fuelling suggestions that an unseen hand was remote controlling events in the court room.

Paedia Express Multimedia was told by Barrister Akintola Olaniyi that the documents should have been rightly served to the defendant alone and that in his years of practice has never heard of anything to the contrary.

Analysts believe that this was been done by the defendants in cahoots with their lawyer and the bailiff to frustrate the case so that it will be thrown out via legal technicalities as they will claim that they were not rightfully served their notice and as such it was wrong for them to have been tried in absentia.

The Court said”we served them but according to what is available to me here ,it was the defendant’s lawyer that was served in the first instance while on the second occasion it was the defendant that  was served but we did not meet them in the office”